|
|
Post by CJ on Apr 4, 2012 16:36:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Apr 5, 2012 3:41:08 GMT -5
Damn him, taking the good sport of "kick the fuck out of the other guy" in to disrepute.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Apr 5, 2012 9:29:07 GMT -5
Damn him, taking the good sport of "kick the fuck out of the other guy" in to disrepute. Don't be so grumpy mr. I'm surprised people don't fail the tests more often. |
|
|
|
Post by Premier Blah on Apr 5, 2012 14:12:51 GMT -5
Oh boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent P on Apr 6, 2012 8:51:24 GMT -5
Hmmm, makes you wonder what the result would have been if he did the test back in November for the Lesnar fight
|
|
|
|
Post by Young Chris Jericho on Apr 6, 2012 17:53:51 GMT -5
Isn't every card the "Biggest event in UFC history"?
|
|
|
|
Post by basicdugganomix on Apr 7, 2012 12:26:50 GMT -5
They mean literally as it was an all heavyweight card
|
|
|
|
Post by HagSIN on Apr 8, 2012 0:21:11 GMT -5
Who the hell is dos Santos gonna defend against now? Carwin again? Or I'm guessing the title defense is just gonna be scrapped from the card altogether.
|
|
|
|
Post by basicdugganomix on Apr 8, 2012 16:35:40 GMT -5
May as well bump up Mir, but who knows.
I think it is hilarious, over at various mmaboards, that people are saying PED's should be allowed
|
|
|
|
Post by Young Chris Jericho on Apr 8, 2012 17:23:23 GMT -5
They mean literally as it was an all heavyweight card Ahhhh. |
|
|
|
Post by Agent P on Apr 9, 2012 12:41:04 GMT -5
Maybe he could beat up Cain some more
|
|
|
|
Post by HagSIN on Apr 9, 2012 14:22:06 GMT -5
Maybe he could beat up Cain some more I'm not totally clear on the rules but is there not an immediate contendership for the previous championship in UFC? I don't recall anyone ever losing the title and getting an immediate rematch. Note: And by 'immediate rematch' I mean the champion who just lost getting the first title shot at the new champion |
|
|
|
Post by Agent P on Apr 9, 2012 16:17:29 GMT -5
Maybe he could beat up Cain some more I'm not totally clear on the rules but is there not an immediate contendership for the previous championship in UFC? I don't recall anyone ever losing the title and getting an immediate rematch. Note: And by 'immediate rematch' I mean the champion who just lost getting the first title shot at the new champion I don't think so, but I honestly don't think too many people would care at this point |
|
|
|
Post by basicdugganomix on Apr 10, 2012 19:23:36 GMT -5
Maybe he could beat up Cain some more I'm not totally clear on the rules but is there not an immediate contendership for the previous championship in UFC? I don't recall anyone ever losing the title and getting an immediate rematch. Note: And by 'immediate rematch' I mean the champion who just lost getting the first title shot at the new champion Frankie Edgar is Mr. Rematch. As in he gave both BJ and Gray a rematch. He lost his title and is getting an immediate rematch with Ben Henderson. I hope Frankie gets injured, so Bendo can fight somebody else |
|
|
|
Post by HagSIN on Apr 11, 2012 15:33:44 GMT -5
In that case I wouldn't mind seeing JDS/Velasquez II just to see if Cain could put up more of a fight.
|
|
|
|
Post by CJ on Apr 12, 2012 21:38:38 GMT -5
Overeem's gonna speak on MMA Uncensored
|
|
|
|
Post by CJ on Apr 12, 2012 22:07:14 GMT -5
Dude didn't even talk about the situation at hand. He just talked about beating Dos Santos.
He seems pretty confident that he's gonna end up fighting.
|
|
|
|
Post by "Avian" Crowwreak on Apr 14, 2012 22:46:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by basicdugganomix on Apr 15, 2012 16:50:08 GMT -5
Yet punk is friends with mr trt chael sonnen
|
|
|
|
Post by "Avian" Crowwreak on Apr 21, 2012 9:08:51 GMT -5
I was merely looking for some form of condescending look in the image, My first choice was Triple H's laugh and point, but I couldn't find it.
|
|
|
|
Post by conquistador3 on May 3, 2012 6:37:34 GMT -5
I'm surprised people don't fail the tests more often. I won't talk about all the dirty details here but there are many ways to "cover up your tracks" while using illicit substances. Laboratory tests have evolved, but "sports medicine" has evolved even more. For example it would have taken a decade more to unmask second generation EPO hadn't somebody gone to Federales with infos people from all sports were using it. In fact sports authorities didn't even suspect the existence of second generation EPO until Federal authorities told them. And developing reliable laboratory tests to track it down proved to be a lengthy, expensive process fraught with many failures. For example one present method of finding illegal substances is to look for masking substances or their metabolic byproducts. It's pretty tricky since many masking substances are contained in perfectly legal dietary supplements or even processed food. Another issue is, unless you have someone blowing the whistle or police confiscate some substances and passes the data on, you have no clue what is in use at the moment so you are basically hitting at random. There are some extremely refined drug combinations on the market right now and rest assured both sportsmen and their doctors won't share the data willingly. I remember an episode: a distant relative, whose husband is an amateur cyclist, gave me a laundry list of stuff she found in the refrigerator. She knew I went to the Uni (Chemistry) and wanted to know what the Hell that stuff was. It was exactly what you think it is and, no, I am not giving any detail in public. Some of that stuff was rabidly expensive and very hard to obtain even with a medical prescription. And he's an amateur. Granted, controls at that level are next to non existent, but imagine what professionals have access to. |
|
